You are currently viewing Proofreading, Proof-editing and Copy-editing: What To Expect

Proofreading, Proof-editing and Copy-editing: What To Expect

  • Post author:
  • Post comments:0 Comments
  • Post last modified:8th April 2021

Proofreading, Proof-editing and Copy-editing: What’s the Difference?

Amongst the many questions I’m asked is what I can do for a given piece of work. There are two aspects to this answer, namely, what I’m allowed to do (i.e., academic fairness/plagiarism with regard to students studying for an undergraduate or postgraduate degree award), which is generally the limiting factor, and the extent of the changes that your work needs.

To understand this better, we can refer to the tables below:

Suitability Guide and Expectations

This table describes the type of individual, document types, issues, etc., that will be addressed for each type of editing.

For those writing essays, projects, theses, etc., for a degree-type award, I am typically limited to something along the lines of proofreading, though there is some flexibility in this depending on the regulations set by your university’s/institution’s academic senate; some are relatively relaxed about formatting, structural issues, etc., whilst others are very strict.

Note that in all circumstances, I consider myself bound by your academic senates regulations as stepping outside these constitutes plagiarism. This said, I will correct language if you are not a native English speaker, though if you are aware of significant problems with your English, you must allow extra time for your work to be completed.

Element Proofreading Proof-editing Copy-editing*
Typically suitable for undergraduates, postgraduates, private individuals postdocs, research fellows, teaching fellows, lecturers, professors, businesses, private individuals businesses, commercial entities, private individuals
Typical Document Types essays, dissertations, Master’s theses, PhD/DPhil theses papers, grant proposals, curricula vitae, covering letters, books manuals, general business documentation
Document Version final draft early draft
Proofing Quality/Standard** essentially error-free significantly improved to essentially error-free significant content added to essentially complete
Issues Addressed surface issues, e.g., misspelling, grammar, punctuation, certain issues with formatting, etc. (see below) as well as surface issues, will correct more serious issues, such as clarity, readability, smooth narration, etc. core issues, including everything under proofreading and proof-editing as well as additional content generation***
Collaboration Required little to none some extensive
Relative Time Required short short to moderate moderate to long
Will Further Proofing Be Needed? extremely unlikely possibly likely
Can Emergency Work Be Undertaken? very likely possibly highly unlikely
Acceptable File Formats MS Word, OpenDocument, Rich Text Format, LaTeX, others MS Word, OpenDocument, Rich Text Format, LaTeX, others MS Word, OpenDocument, Rich Text Format, LaTeX, others
Custom or Bespoke Requirements yes – include when emailing documentation yes – include when emailing documentation yes – include when emailing documentation

* For reasons of academic fairness, copy-editing is never appropriate for academic work.

**I would stress that the quality of the work returned will be in proportion to the quality of that I receive (this is evident in the proofing quality/standard noted in the table above). No proofreader can be one hundred per cent accurate, and the lower the quality of your work, the less accurate or useful the corrections. See my post on expected standards of proofreading for further details on this matter.

***Note that any possible or assumed copyright to such context is waived on my part.

What I Can Do For Each Proofing Type

This table provides a general summary of the type of corrections I do for each proofing type, though for students there is some flexibility within the bounds set by your academic senate. As mentioned, though, I will never at any time break the standards of academic fairness.

You should be able to find guidance for proofreaders on your university/institution website, and it would be helpful to send the associated link to me if possible. Please note that I consider you to be entirely responsible for ensuring that your university/institution will allow external proofreading.

Element Proofreading Proof-editing Copy-editing
Corrections To:
Spelling
Grammar
Punctuation
Inconsistencies
Ensure Consistency Of:
Dialect
Spelling Variations
Capitalisation
Hyphenation
Bold, Italics, Underline, etc.
Clarity Of Writing:
Advice On
Correction Of:
Style Sheets:
Ensure Consistency With ?
Do From Scratch
Formatting:
Ensure Consistency Of ?
Do From Scratch
Referencing:
Do From Scratch n/a
Cross-referencing:
Apply A Style (e.g., APA, Harvard) ?
Correct Minor Issues(e.g., spelling, grammar)
Footnotes/Endnotes:
Basic Corrections
Formatting Of: ?
Creation Of: ?
Miscellaneous Corrections:
General Commentary and Feedback ?
Add/Create Content ?
Check Audience Suitability
Repetition ?
Wordiness ?
Advice on Plagiarism Reports
Plagiarism Check ?
Paraphrasing
Structural Advice ? ?
Structural Alteration ?
Change Argument

✔ : can be done for the given level of proofing
✖ : cannot be done for the given level of proofing (i.e., for reasons of academic fairness)
? : will depend on circumstances if this can be done (i.e., depending on the regulations set by your academic senate)

Concerned About the Above? Get In Contact!

As ever, if you need advice on the above then please do contact me.

Mark Watkins

Since completing a PhD in Physical Chemistry in 2000, I have made significant contributions to 30 publications in the scientific literature, and have been active in correcting work ranging from undergraduate projects to PhD theses and grant applications. Subsequent to leaving academia, my academic experience has allowed me to help with the work of hundreds of proofreading clients.

Leave a Reply